Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Many thanks to you for putting it together and to the forum members for taking the time to post their replies and give their time to help others. Their isn't another site that can touch it..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
dezignit (Materials)
31 Jul 04 3:34
Hi, I am in the process of designing a fully automatic mold to produce a gear shift type bellows although the design differs in that the wall thickness is substantially higher. Typically, the chocking ID is 108mm, whilst the undercut is 140mm. This means an undercut of 18.5mm per side with a wall thickness of around 3mm. Normally for thin wall I would simply inflate this off the core, however this is abnormal. Can anyone give me an indication whether Hytrel HTR8105BK will expand this far and return to original diameter. If not, i will have to implemet undercut demolding core which I do not really want to do. I have checked the DuPont site out with little success.
Thanks,

dezignit  
patprimmer (Publican)
31 Jul 04 20:02
If DuPont can't help, try DSM and the equivalent grade of Arnitel.

You might get a better response by asking each of their technical departments the specific question.

Personally I don't see the wall section effecting anything other than the pressure required. The elongation to jump over the undercut will be about the same, so the recovery should be about the same.

I say about because with the higher pressure it might be a bit harder to control the dynamics of the stretch and jump process, and the TPE properties might change slightly with wall section, mainly due to different cooling (and therefore shrinkage)rates and to different ratio of cross sectional area effected by the orientation the can occur as material flows differently on the surface vs down the centre of the section.

Regards
pat   pprimmer@acay.com.au
eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close