dynamic friction & sliding friction
dynamic friction & sliding friction
(OP)
A new data sheet is being drafted and I'm stuck over which description implies greater accuracy. Will "dynamic friction", as opposed to "sliding friction" which apparently is a newer alternative description carry the day?
Static friction. Well no change there.
Rolling friction. No problem, it describes the type of friction.
Sliding friction. I'm getting the hang of this.
Dynamic friction? I know what it is, I learned it at school and I'm comfortable with it, but now, alongside the others, it seems out of place.
Thanks for your help
Static friction. Well no change there.
Rolling friction. No problem, it describes the type of friction.
Sliding friction. I'm getting the hang of this.
Dynamic friction? I know what it is, I learned it at school and I'm comfortable with it, but now, alongside the others, it seems out of place.
Thanks for your help





RE: dynamic friction & sliding friction
Regards,
Cory
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: dynamic friction & sliding friction
RE: dynamic friction & sliding friction
RE: dynamic friction & sliding friction
RE: dynamic friction & sliding friction
(Do not infer extraordinary punctiliousness on my part, but considering the forum I am compelled to comment! :)
RE: dynamic friction & sliding friction
I stand by infer(alternative word = assume) but accept that imply is an excellent alternative.
RE: dynamic friction & sliding friction
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=infer
Regards,
Cory
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.