INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS
Come Join Us!
Are you an
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
- Talk With Other Members
- Be Notified Of Responses
To Your Posts
- Keyword Search
- One-Click Access To Your
- Automated Signatures
On Your Posts
- Best Of All, It's Free!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.
Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
What's the difference between Crystalline and Amorphous States?
Posted: 10 Jun 04 (Edited 27 Sep 04)
Polymer Services Group
The nature of crystalline and amorphous polymer states is often misconstrued and misused. The term amorphous means to have no defined shape, or an easily altered shape, like a liquid or a rubber. Crystalline, on the other hand, insinuates that there is a regular, defined pattern to the molecular aggregates --- crystallized carbon forms a substance we call ôdiamondö. These terms are used to define two separate ôsolidö states that exist particularly in polymers. The confusing part is that they coexist in many polymers --- the so-called semi-crystalline polymers.
The amorphous nature of polymers is analogous to a plateful of spaghetti --- loose and randomly coiled. While the crystalline state is more like the uncooked spaghetti in the box --- the chains are all tightly bundled and ordered in the same direction.
In a polymer, these two states coexist, with adjacent sections polymers packing into tight crystalline bundles held together by secondary attraction forces, while other sections of the same molecules are unable to physically move into the crystalline lattice and remain amorphous. For the most part, the probability of a particular polymer segment being crystalline or amorphous is purely a random event controlled by the dynamics of the crystallization process --- in effect, the portion of the segment that is in the amorphous state is no different from that part of the polymer which got ôtrappedö in the crystallized state.
Oftentimes someone will discuss extracting the ôamorphousö material out of the polymer. To some extent, this can be performed particularly where the amorphous state is composed of polymer fractions that are not acceptable into the polymer lattice, i.e., highly branched species, or very low molecular weight polymer fractions. This procedure was once used to extract atactic polypropylene from a polymerization to enhance its crystalline content. In reality, this is merely a procedure for removing a contaminant, non-crystallizable atactic polypropylene, from the crystallizable isotactic polymer form. For most polymers, however, one cannot extract the amorphous material from the crystalline sections.
In general, polymers which can crystallize, do so until they can no longer get into a conformation or position to ôpackö with other chains because of some physical restraint. The only difference between amorphous polymer and crystalline polymer is that the amorphous material physically could not enter the crystalline lattice at the time it was formed. The amorphous state, therefore, consists of loose chain ends, ôloopsö of polymer segments that exit and then reenter the same crystalline domain, as well as polymer segments which crystallize in two adjacent lattices --- tie molecules. Tie molecules are amorphous polymer segments which hold the crystalline segments together --- they form the mortar between the bricks which enhances the properties of semi-crystalline polymers. Without these intercrystalline links, there would be nothing holding the polymer together except weak secondary attractive forces.
Back to Polymer engineering FAQ Index
Back to Polymer engineering Forum
PLM drives product innovation and growth in manufacturers of all sizes. But midsized manufacturers face unique challenges when looking for a PLM system. Download Now
Engineers report spending a third of their time on non-value added work. Even worse, 20% of their time is spent working with outdated information, which often leads to wasted effort and rework. Download Now
CAM applications can dramatically shorten a companyâ€™s design to manufacturing cycle. Yet few machine shops have implemented truly integrated CAD to CAM processes. Download Now
Product engineers and tooling manufacturers have much to gain from 3D printing: By generating low-cost physical prototypes early in the design process, they can check form, fit and function, gauge customer response and compare design iterations without commitment. Download Now
Join Eng-Tips® Today!
Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.
Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:
- Talk To Other Members
- Notification Of Responses To Questions
- Favorite Forums One Click Access
- Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...
Register now while it's still free!
Already a member? Close this window and log in.
Join Us Close